|
The value of standards is clearly demonstrable; we need only look to
the manufacturing sector to see their value. In oceanography, there
have been many discussions and solutions for processing data and
information. Many useful ideas, each a solution to an immediate
problem, have been developed and put into practice, but there have been
few successful attempts to develop and implement international
standards in managing data.
In the past decades IODE has made a number of attempts to agree on
data management standards (e.g. MEDI and mXML for marine metadata).
However these attempts were not successful, possibly due to
insufficient coordination with other similar initiatives.
Consult also the JCOMM Catalogue of Practices and Standards
|
Recommended Standards
January 2010:
Recommendation to Adopt ISO 3166-1 and 3166-3 Country Codes as the Standard for
Identifying Countries in Oceanographic Data Exchange. Intergovernmental Oceanographic
Commission of UNESCO, 15 pp. (IOC Manuals and Guides No. 54, Volume 1)
(English)
Published on 6 January 2010
DOWNLOAD
|
Reasons why now may be opportune to achieve success in developing international standards include:
- Internet and computer technologies allow for a more rapid
exchange of data and information than possible in the past. Each
individual partner in the exchange needs to understand the content and
create software to transcribe what is delivered into the local data
structures. This puts a serious burden on resources.
- Data volumes and sources are increasing rapidly. We must improve our handling of data and nformation.
- GEOSS
is striving to develop a “system of systems” that links together many
of the data and information sources around the world. This is a
standards setting process without which GEOSS will not succeed.
- Major
national and international data management projects in oceanography are
underway in response to problems of managing the data in their
multiplicity of structures and contents. International projects such as
SeaDataNet must adopt standards to achieve the degree of cooperation
foreseen.
- Participants at IODE-19 identified standards as one
of the most critical elements to provide interoperability with IODE
data centres and to share data.
- The recently adopted IOC Data
and Information Strategy encourages the adoption of standards to
support data usability and acknowledges that the success of the
Strategy is dependent on the acceptance and implementation of standards
It is clear that the process of setting standards is underway. We can
either play a passive role in this process, or guide it so that the
experience we have gained over the years is reflected in those
standards.
In partnership with the JCOMM Data Management Coordination Group IODE organized the IODE/JCOMM Forum on Oceanographic Data Management and Exchange Standards between 21-25 January 2008 at the IOC Project Office for IODE in Oostende, Belgium. (find out more HERE )
The meeting discussed a wide variety of topics including metadata, ontology resources, date and time, lat, lon, alt, countries, platforms, platform types, quality control (temperature and salinity profiles, surface temperature and salinity, sea level, currents, surface waves), quality flags, projects, institutions, units, instruments, science words, taxa and parameters.
The meeting further agreed on a "Standards Process" that will enable the recommendation of a standard to IOC and WMO. It was further agreed that a dedicated web site will be established to monitor progress of submissions and to disseminate adopted standards.
The we site is accessible through http://www.oceandatastandards.org
The Third Session of the JCOMM Data Management Coordination Group (Oostende, Belgium, 26-28 March 2008) (find the report here ) agreed with the Process as proposed by the Forum and establised the "Pilot Project on teh IODE/JCOMM Standards process". The Group further agreed that the PIlot Project will be managed by the IODE/JCOMM ETDMP and elected the Chairperson of the ETDMP (Dr. Nick Mikhailov) to lead the Pilot Project. It was further agreed that the membership of the Pilot Project should be balanced between the WMO and IOC communities and requested the ETDMP to create the membership in this way. The ETDMP will make the necessary arrangements for documenting and publishing the recommended standards as well as to cotninue their management, including updating.
|